'Drying up' your right to bear arms

Here they go...and it's not just so-called 'assault rifles'. Check out the firearms Feinstein and other Democrats want banned, and pay attention to the language used...

TheHill: Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) and a group of Senate Democrats on Thursday introduced legislation to ban the sale and manufacture of more than 150 types of semi-automatic weapons with military-style features.

The legislation also bans magazines holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition and requires people who already own assault rifles to use secure storage and safety devices and bars them from selling high-capacity clips.

“No weapon is taken from anyone,” said Feinstein. “The purpose is to dry up the supply of these weapons over time.”



Unlike the 1994 assault-weapons ban, there is no sunset provision in Feinstein’s newest gun-control bill.

Btw, 'Military-style features' means cosmetics that liberals don't like...which are actually less threatening than Feinstein's mug! They're no more military-grade weapons than she is an honorable Senator (for those unfamiliar with this wretched woman, she's not!).

Also to note, an associate of mine far more versed in firearms than I informed me that several of these handguns listed have never been considered 'assault weapons'...until now. They're simply targeted for either their semi-automatic characteristics or magazine capacity. All this from a woman who doesn't have a problem carrying for her own protection, either past or present.

One of her police body guards let it slip that she contributed a cheap model for the meltdown, while retaining her .357 magnum revolver for her own personal self-defense.

Hypocrisy on parade. Feinstein's presser exuded this description from the very beginning with that false prophet from the National Cathedral in DC...



Perhaps I shouldn't have used the word parade, but rather charade. Because the expansion of deception being promulgated by an overreaching government after the Sandy Hook massacre is absolutely astonishing...from the fact that Connecticut already had an assault weapons ban in place that didn’t prevent this murderer from killing, to NBC's admission that there was no assault rifle used in the shooting, to the one rifle that was actually found was recovered from the trunk of the shooter's car after the shooting...and it doesn't even appear to be the dreaded AR-15 that Piers Morgan and other gun-banning nuts are constantly screaming about!

So with that knowledge, with the dog-and-pony show of this morning's presser, and with the release of this list, I'm supposed to believe that this is simply about protecting us from gun violence, and not a slow-and-steady disarming of the citizen, an infringement on all of our constitutional and unalienable rights preserved for the past 226 years until now? 'Oh, you're just being hysterical' you say? Hey, don't take my word for it...listen from the Senator's own lips...

"If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States for an outright ban, picking up everyone of them, Mr. and Mrs. America, turn'em all in, I would have done it."

Uh huh...that's not tyrannical.

In the words of U.S. Marine Joshua Boston:

I am not your subject. I am the man who keeps you free. I am not your servant. I am the person whom you serve. I am not your peasant. I am the flesh and blood of America.

I will not be disarmed to suit the fear that has been established by the media and your misinformation campaign against the American public.

Stand up and stand against this tyranny, America. Call your congressional members today, tomorrow, everyday. Stand firm and RESIST!