Tuesday, September 1, 2015

Carson catching Trump, but headlines & Iowa still missing the bigger picture

Some good competition...
TheWeek: Ben Carson is tied with Donald Trump in Iowa in the latest Monmouth University Poll released Monday, marking the first time that a GOP contender has closed the gap in Trump's lead in the primary. Both Carson and Trump got 23 percent support from Iowa's Republican voters, while former Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina came in third with 10 percent of the vote. None of the other candidates in the Republican field eked out double-digit support.

Aside from marking the big moment in which Trump no longer leads the rest of the GOP field by a wide margin, the poll also provides an illuminating look at what Iowa voters value in a Republican presidential candidate. None of the poll's top three contenders (Trump, Carson, and Fiorina) comes from a political background; all are considered outsider candidates.
And an arguably better chronology...

Sure, they may not be from Washington, but that doesn't necessarily exclude them from the characteristics of Washington. Now from the records, Carson is clearly the least offensive; however, it should be noted that Iowa's still missing out on the BEST of a golden opportunity when it comes to the most conservative choices...

Comparitively, I could emphasize of the guy with the most green lights, that just because he's in Washington, doesn't make him of Washington. I know that's a rarity these days, but the collective hatred from both sides of the Washington Establishment should confidently prove that without a shadow of a doubt.

Source: CR, Presidential Candidate Comparison (go here to see precisely what those little dots mean!)


Obama's degrowth bound in Alaska

Yet again, another vacation and the only thing transparent about this president is his authenticity. (Yeah, that's not Obama...but he thinks it is.)

Just count the contradictions, false narratives and damn lies as he says "I expect to learn a lot" on his Alaska trip, while it's apparent that his opinions have already been formed about the pseudo-science of global cooling warming climate-change. He's just hoping to discover more anecdotes to buttress the green propaganda...for the green in your pockets!

RCP: President Obama is travelling to Alaska next week, to see the effects of climate change. According to Obama, Alaska has "some of the swiftest shoreline erosion in the world, in some places more than three feet per year. The glaciers are melting faster too, threatening tourism and adding to rising seas."

"If we do nothing, Alaskan temperatures are expected to rise between six and twelve degrees by the end of the century, changing all sorts of industries forever. This is all real. This is happening to our fellow Americans right now."

"Alaska's governor recently told me that four villages are in imminent danger and need to be relocated. Already rising sea levels are beginning to swallow an island community."
It's spelled N-A-T-U-R-E. But if it neither proves nor disproves the Left's enviro-belief, then it must be the truth they need to propel the cause. So, by Obama's logic, the SUN has nothing to do with anything, plant life doesn't require the greenhouse gases of water vapor or carbon dioxide, his home state of Hawaii would have never been allowed to form square foot after square foot of accumulated lava flow from continuous volcanic activity, nor would his politically-adopted state of Illinois contain a Great Lake on its northeastern shore carved out from glacial retreat 20,000 years ago. Natural cycles couldn't possibly exist. And the same computer models that have projected wrongly all these years are somehow now right and real!

While Obama's EPA continues to hide evidence of its own disasters and shams, this resident would be so willfully ignorant and arrogant as to promote the idea that man is capable of controlling the elements.

There is a distinct difference between the reality of being good stewards and the illusion of being something greater. I'm pretty sure renaming mountains and joining reality shows contribute to neither, but whatever it takes to further the degrowth movement, he'll do it.

Related links: In Alaska, Obama depicts stark future without action on climate change by US, other countries
Obama said it, now he's doing it: Killing American energy production through his EPA arm to control you

Monday, August 31, 2015

Obama's renaming mountains now...

In yet another act to scoff at a Congress that won't hold him accountable, President Obama takes his executive orders to new heights...literally.
RWNews: The arrogance of this president has reached new heights–if you will–as now Obama thinks he can just start renaming mountains because he feels like it. Over the weekend Obama wiped Alaska’s Mt. McKinley off the map and decided to rename it Mr. Denali.

Mt. McKinley, the tallest mountain in Alaska, has been named after President William McKinley for almost 100 years. But that isn’t good enough for Obama. He has now changed it to Mt. Denali because that is what native Americans called it before Alaska became a state.

As McKinley was from Ohio, both Democrats and Republicans in the Buckeye State are furious with Obama’s pandering to the native Americans.
Ohio lawmakers reacted angrily Sunday to the White House’s announcement that President Obama would formally rename Alaska’s Mt. McKinley — North America’s highest peak — “Denali” during his trip to The Last Frontier this week.

“Mount McKinley … has held the name of our nation’s 25th President for over 100 years,” Rep. Bob Gibbs, R-Ohio, said in a statement. “This landmark is a testament to his countless years of service to our country.” Gibbs also described Obama’s action as “constitutional overreach,” saying that an act of Congress was required to rename the mountain, because a law formally naming it after Ohio’s William McKinley was passed in 1917.

“This political stunt is insulting to all Ohioans, and I will be working with the House Committee on Natural Resources to determine what can be done to prevent this action,” Gibbs said.

The Ohio delegation’s disappointment at the decision cut across party lines.

“We must retain this national landmark’s name in order to honor the legacy of this great American president and patriot,” Democratic Rep. Tim Ryan, whose district includes McKinley’s hometown of Niles, in eastern Ohio.
Amusingly, the Native American word “Denali” means “the high one,” and people are saying that Obama must be “high” to change the name of this mountain just because he feels like it.
What's Boehner gonna do, cry? See what all those rounds of golf have done for you with your good pal? I don't guess any branch of government will ever hold this rogue president accountable...so will future one's receive the same regard? And would Americans really want that?

Hewitt discussed this latest abuse of power with Cruz, who called it "the latest manifestation of the megalomaniacal imperial presidency that we have seen for six and a half years. This administration has been the most lawless administration we've ever seen, and this presidient routinely disregards the law, disregards the Constitution, disregards the Congress..." Cruz continued to remind listeners of Obama's tendencies...
"One of the things that Barack Obama said is, "I am not an emperor." That was his explanation for why he couldn't unilaterally issue amnesty. And then a few months later the election was approaching, and I guess he became an emperor, because he issued the order that he had just said he would have had to be an emperor to issue!"

Question is, though, will Congress do anything about it? Sadly, I think we all know the answer.

Eh, as long as it's just another white man's mark erased, no big deal, right? This president divides daily.

Related links: Sorry, McKinley: Obama orders name change of highest continental peak to “Denali”
Obama goes on climate tour in Alaska, gets called massive hypocrite

Thursday, August 27, 2015

The malfeasance of the governing class is why we now need a border fence

...among a laundry list of neglect. But it wasn't always this way from either party, not even so long ago...
The Democrat party has become so radical and un-American that you wouldn’t recognize it 20 years ago. The 1996 Democratic platform stated we must remain a nation of laws and cannot tolerate illegal immigration, but today they say the exact opposite. The same could be said about the Republicans and open-borders Republicans like Jeb Bush, who claim we can’t build a wall because it will cost too much. Fences clearly work and would take pressure off border patrol agents trying to keep up with the flow of illegal immigration. ~ ML, 8/27/15
'Remember when the entire Democratic Party was like Donald Trump?' asks Matt Welch @ Reason. There's much to read (and weep) of the 1996 party platform on immigration, crime, drugs and “zero tolerance”, but here's just a taste...
Here's your who-said-it of the day:
[W]e must remain a nation of laws. We cannot tolerate illegal immigration and we must stop it. For years […], Washington talked tough but failed to act….[O]ur borders might as well not have existed. The border was under-patrolled, and what patrols there were, were under-equipped. Drugs flowed freely. Illegal immigration was rampant. Criminal immigrants, deported after committing crimes in America, returned the very next day to commit crimes again.
OK, so the headline gives it away, but that's the Democratic Party's official platform for 1996. Mirroring that year's Republican platform, which was arguably the most stringent anti-illegal-immigration tract in the GOP's modern history, the Dem document is filled with tough talk...
Now, not only have Democrats made a complete 180 from that platform (and constituency), but the GOP cowers from this tough LAWFUL talk as well (mostly in fear of campaign coffers affected).

If Jeb Bush can put his other grand ideas down for just a moment, along with much of the rest of the GOP, and the entirety of Washington for that matter, Democrats included, let's pretend as if we believe in national sovereignty again, because Daniel Horowitz makes a compelling case for the Border Fence (yes, the one Congress already passed to create, but never funded!)...

CR: Yes, border fences work. And that is exactly why the political class is so stridently intent on opposing the construction of a full double-layered fence or any effective barrier at the border.

The bipartisan open borders cartel is all in favor of discussing sundry forms of “border security,” especially if it will afford them the political cover to pass amnesty. But the one tangible form of border security they will never support, and in fact, pull out all stops to prevent, is the completion of the border fence.

Several weeks ago, Jeb Bush released his amnesty plan. In order to grease the skids for his amnesty proposal, Jeb released a “six point plan” for securing the border. The one thing that is missing, of course, is the competition of the double-layered security fence.

One of the most pervasive arguments against a border fence is the puerile nursery chant, “show me a 20-foot fence, I’ll show you a 21-foot ladder.” Even 2016 presidential candidate Rick Perry is oft to advance this intellectually dishonest argument. The problem is they can’t show us the 21-foot ladder. The border fence that conservatives are advocating has worked in San Diego and it has worked in Israel. It will work for much of the rest of the border.
This detailed piece goes on with further analysis, examples and other imperative information towards the very realistic (yes, Jorge Ramos) border fence. But perhaps the last section puts the true cost and necessity for such a structure into perspective...
Will a border fence cost money? Will it look aesthetically unpleasing in some places? Sure, but the cost of illegal immigration on our welfare, education, hospitals, criminal justice system, highway safety, drug violence, and culture is incalculable and infinite. And the sight of dead bodies and drug smugglers is more offensive than a security barrier. ...

Ideally, we should not need a full security fence at our southern border. As Moses observed when the Jews were conquering the land of Canaan, the weaker cities were the ones encompassed by a wall while the stronger ones were confident in their prowess for defense. And indeed, if we had a country that actually enforced our laws, cut off the magnets, and held the government of Mexico accountable for their violation of our sovereignty, we wouldn’t need a wall. But we are not a strong country at a political level. In fact, we have a weak and malfeasant governing class. We therefore need a border fence.
And that's the reality of the matter...if only either side of the aisle in Washington had the will to acknowledge their malfeasance and reverse course. But for some reason, the pro-illegal detriments wager more time, attention and money (suckage) with the D.C. crowd than the pro-citizenry benefits, and in that, America continues to be destroyed from within.


Another end-run around the GOP Senate: Obama pushes for Iran nuke filibuster

President Obama is scheming with Senate democrats to use a filibuster to prevent a vote on the Iran nuclear agreement. If Mitch McConnell were any kind of leader he would’ve suspended the filibuster for the remainder of Obama’s presidency. ~ ML, 8/27/15
And once again, McConnell and GOP leadership are outmaneuvered by Dem bulbs that everybody outside of Washington had the ability to see coming a mile away. What the hell, Republicans?
Politico: President Barack Obama’s almost certain to get the Iran nuclear deal through Congress — but whether he gets there by filibuster or sustained veto could make all the difference.

A Democratic filibuster in the Senate would be a clear victory for the president, allowing Obama to say that for all the political noise there wasn’t enough actual opposition to the nuclear agreement with the Islamic republic to even get to a final vote.
Levin blasted the GOP tonight, save for one member...
TRS: Obama is trying to turn the tables on Republicans, pushing for a filibuster of the Iran disapproval vote in the Senate so that the up or down vote that he agreed to earlier this year doesn’t even happen. Of course! Republicans made a deal with the devil and now it looks like they are gonna get burned. Corker is angry. So what.

Mark Levin has warned Republicans that Obama couldn’t be trusted on this, as he pointed out tonight, but the Senate GOP leadership and all but one Republican voted to give away the Senate’s power to approve this deal.

I know Ted Cruz said he supported the deal because at least it would give him a chance to vote on the deal. See how that is working out? And he’s got no one to blame but himself and his fellow Republicans if Democrats end up filibustering this vote.

Only Tom Cotton did the right thing here. How pathetic is that?
Truth hurts.

Is it too much to ask Congress to reassert its constitutional authority? Apparently so, even under the weakest president in U.S. history, when you're led by weaker legislative leadership.

Related links: AWESOME: Cruz and Trump joining forces to protest Iran deal at Capitol Hill rally
Kerry signs UN gun ban 'treaty' against U.S. Senate wishes...and the Constitution!

Following lib logic, isn't this flag responsible for murder? (ADDENDUMS)

The shooting in Charleston, liberals insisted, was because of a flag and they systematically started immediately, with the assistance of duped Republicans, to remove not only the flags from everywhere they could find one but also any vestiges of Confederate history. Why? Because they told us all that if there were no more Confederate flags, that would prevent the next shooting. And how did that work out? ~ Craig Andresen, The National Patriot, 'Like Vultures, Liberals Circle Virginia Murders'
We all saw how, this piece o' excrement made certain of that. And it would appear that this maniac had a hate-flag of his own in his Virginia apartment. So by liberal standards, shouldn't we be inundated with calls to take down this flag by now?
Breitbart: The Daily Telegraph has learned that “police reportedly confiscated a gay pride flag” from the apartment of Vester Lee Flanagan Wednesday. In an apparent hate crime, Flanagan is the 41 year-old black journalist who murdered two white Virginia reporters on live television Wednesday morning before turning his gun on himself.

In a manifesto faxed to ABC News, Flanagan, an Obama-supporter, claimed that his motive involved a “race war.” Flanagan was black and gay and apparently angered by the fact that he had been a victim of racism and homophobia at the hands of “black men and white women.”

Both of Flanagan’s intended victims were straight.

The gay pride rainbow flag reportedly found in Flanagan’s apartment is seen by many as a symbol of anti-Christian hate.

After a white racist terrorist in South Carolina murdered nine innocent black churchgoers, photos of the racist with the Confederate Flag resulted in a media frenzy to ban the flag.

Like the Confederate flag, the provocative gay pride flag, a symbol of religious oppression, has flown on government property.

The Confederate Flag has since been taken down in South Carolina.

Thus far, other than a mention in the Telegraph, the media has not reported on the fact that Flanagan might have owned the LGBT rainbow hate-flag.

Shhh...don't blow the facade! Fact is, same as with the gun grabbers, the feigned outrage is only dependent on the political expedient.
From Matt Walsh: "It will be interesting to see how quickly this shooting disappears from the headlines now that we know the killer was a racist black gay man." ~ via Steve Deace FB page
At this point, it wouldn't surprise me at all if this White House found it appropriate to re-illuminate in mourning.

ADDENDUM: Oh, and about that Obama support...
Does that mean his Obama advocacy had anything to do with the murders? No. But you can be damn sure that if he had been a Tea Party fan, they would have been more than happy to plaster that all over the headlines.
ADDENDUM II: The mainstream media silence is deafening in its BIAS...they just COMPLETELY IGNORE the fact that the VA shooter was a gay, black Obama supporter...
GatewayPundit: Black hustler and reporter Vester Flanagan was an Angry Barack Obama Democrat.
** He was reprimanded for wearing a Barack Obama sticker at work.
** He had his racial suits tossed from court
** He was a “high paid companion“
** He attempted to subpoena personnel records on both of his victims

Then he shot two white reporters dead—

Killer Vester Flanagan was a big Obama supporter.
** He was written up in November 2012 for wearing a Barack Obama sticker.

But you would not know Flanagan was an Obama supporter and Democrat from the US mainstream media.
The US media completely ignored these facts. It didn’t fit their narrative.

Not a single US mainstream media outlet stressed that Flanagan was a radical gay Obama-supporting Democrat. If it was mentioned it was buried deep in their reports.

This is what you call “Democrat Privilege” and it is real.
America, you just got duped again.

Wednesday, August 26, 2015

Kerry signs UN gun ban 'treaty' against U.S. Senate wishes...and the Constitution!

Well, that didn't take long, undoubtedly with Obama's pen and phone. So, now they want to use the word treaty...
RWNews: If U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry has his way the United Nations will be able to say if Americans are allowed to have their Second Amendment rights. He has just signed an anti-gun treaty with the United Nations that the U.S. Senate has already said it is against.

The treaty Kerry signed without authorization from the Senate would create an un-Constitutional registry of all US gun buyers and would lead to the UN controlling American’s gun rights.
Secretary of State John Kerry on Wednesday signed a controversial U.N. treaty on arms regulation, riling U.S. lawmakers who vow the Senate will not ratify the agreement.

As he signed the document, Kerry called the treaty a “significant step” in addressing illegal gun sales, while claiming it would also protect gun rights.

“This is about keeping weapons out of the hands of terrorists and rogue actors. This is about reducing the risk of international transfers of conventional arms that will be used to carry out the world’s worst crimes. This is about keeping Americans safe and keeping America strong,” he said. “This treaty will not diminish anyone’s freedom. In fact, the treaty recognizes the freedom of both individuals and states to obtain, possess, and use arms for legitimate purposes.”

U.S. lawmakers, though, have long claimed the treaty could lead to new gun control measures. They note the U.S. Senate has final say on whether to approve the agreement.

Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., in a letter to President Obama, urged his administration not to take any action to implement the treaty without the consent of the Senate.

He claimed the treaty raises “fundamental issues” concerning “individual rights protected by the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution.”

The National Rifle Association blasted the plan, claiming it would impose an “invasive registration scheme” by requiring importing countries to give exporting countries information on “end users.”

“The Obama administration is once again demonstrating its contempt for our fundamental, individual Right to Keep and Bear Arms,” Chris Cox, executive director of the NRA’s Institute for Legislative Action, said in a statement. “These are blatant attacks on the constitutional rights and liberties of every law-abiding American. The NRA will continue to fight this assault on our fundamental freedom.”
Once again Obama’s regime tries to end the Second Amendment by stealth.
Corker, when the hell are you gonna get a clue and understand that no matter how nice you are to this president, his regime, his party, they will continue to tear apart our constitutional rights. Disarming us, but nuking up our enemies! Madness.

As Levin said today, that pen & phone are looking more like a hammer & sickle every day.

Sound advice for the black community from the black community

Came across these over the past few days and WOW! Here's some refreshingly sound advice for the black community from the black community, particularly in lieu of the lackluster racialists who have failed this community and led astray for far too long (including the current occupant in the Oval Office)...

First, presidential candidate Ben Carson says that #BlackLivesMatter has critically misfired, that 'our righteous anger is misdirected at politically convenient targets, not the real culprits,' and suggests in a USAToday op-ed where the marches should take place:
Let’s head down to the board of education. Teaching is a tough job and thank God there was a teacher who convinced me that I was not dumb, but our schools are failing and we have no power to abandon them. The actions of rogue police officers take black lives one at a time. Our public school system has destroyed black lives not in the ones and twos, but in whole generations.

The schools don’t teach and our children don’t learn. Too many public schools are controlled by teachers unions focused more on the convenience and compensation of adults rather than the education of children who started out far behind. Their failures don't kill as quickly, but they do kill as surely as a bullet.

Let’s confront the entertainment industry that lines its pockets by glamorizing a life where black men are thugs and our women are trash. Let’s tell them we plan to start talking with our wallets.

It is time for them to pick on someone else because we have had enough. Demeaning women is not art, and it shouldn’t be profitable. Neither is glorifying violence and equating prison time with authenticity. Straight Outta Compton, #1 in movie theaters, is just the latest example. You only have to watch the trailers.

Let’s go down to city hall. Living behind a door with three deadbolts is not living in freedom. Being too scared to walk around your block at night is not the pursuit of happiness we were all promised.

Let's go over to the crack house. We need to tear it down. Profiting from selling poison to our children and destroying lives must not be the ambition of our children. These monuments to our destruction deserve our active scorn not our silent acceptance.

We should go to Washington. For decades they have fought the "War on Poverty." Poverty won. We lost.

Over 19 trillion dollars has been wasted, but can anyone identify a single battle won as a result? We certainly have not helped the poor “lift themselves out of the ruts of poverty” as Lyndon Johnson promised — far from it. These programs have been a great American failure.

We should have a talk with the Democratic Party. Let's tell them, we don’t want to be clothed, fed and housed. We want honor and dignity.

We don't want a plan to give us public housing in nice neighborhoods. We want an end to excuses for schools that leave us without the means to buy our own houses where we choose to live. We want the skills needed to compete, not a consolation prize of Section 8, Food Stamps and a lifetime of government paperwork.

Finally, we need to go over to the Republican Party. We need to tell them they have ignored us for too long. They need to invite us in and listen to us. We need to communicate and find a different way.
Related link: Ben Carson on Kelly File: Taking on the real problems in Black America

Then there's Peggy Hubbard. She's not a politician, she's not running for anything, she not famous, well wasn't until now. Peggy is a black mom who's had enough and has lit up the internet by speaking hard TRUTH to the hypocrisy of #BlackLivesMatter and the black community in general...
TRS: This video from Peggy Hubbard has over seven MILLION views after she absolutely TORCHES the “Black Lives Matter” movement by pointing out that black lives don’t matter to other blacks.

Dayammmm, Peggy drops some real wisdom in this video! To be sure, she does not say that police brutality is nonexistent, but she simply points out that it’s somewhat hypocritical to be marching that “black lives matter” when many more blacks are murdered by evil scumbags in their own community, than by any white cops, or police of any color.

Good for Peggy – if we had decent human beings like her in every community, our country would be immensely better. And by the views she’s getting, it’s clear that many agree with her.
Related link: BITE ME! – Black grandmother responds to racist ‘Black Lives Matter’ jerks who call her an ‘Uncle Tom’

Consider this, think on it, pray.

#StopTheViolence #AllLivesMatter

Related link: New ‘Common Core’ approved textbook will indoctrinate SIXTH-GRADERS about ‘BLACK LIVES MATTER’

Go back to Univision, Jorge: 101 in commanding a presser, while taking on pro-illegal mouthpiece (ADDENDUMS)

Folks, this should be a primer for every candidate out there, and a lesson for activist journalists, on how media bias can be dealt with. And for better or worse, this has MUCH to do with where Trump is in the polls. Despite a checkered record within the spectrum of conservatism, a candidate that can unapologetically hand the lib press their lunch is a win in the mad-as-hell camp...
RCP: Univision anchor Jorge Ramos stood up at the beginning of Donald Trump's press conference and yelled a question at him. Trump ordered him to sit down and had him escorted out of the room. He was later allowed back in to ask his question in turn.
HotAir: Alternate headline: “Trump rises another 10 points in Republican polls.”

When reporters first started huffing about this on Twitter, it sounded as though Trump had booted this guy out of the room for doing nothing more than asking him a question he didn’t care for, an ominous sign from a would-be president who’s building a reputation for holding grudges. But that’s not what happened. Ramos, true to form, simply stood up and started grandstanding about deportation as Trump tried to call on another reporter. He’s the most shameless amnesty shill in American media and makes no apologies for it; his advice to colleagues in journalism is “Don’t be neutral. Neutrality is for referees in a football game.” He’s an activist for a cause more than a reporter. When someone fitting that description stands up at a public event and begins talking over the speaker, there’s a word for it: Heckling. And hecklers get tossed. That’s what happened here.

Trump eventually let him back in the room, if only to spare America the ordeal of endless think pieces tomorrow about Jorge Ramos’s sacred First Amendment right to talk over everyone in the room at a press conference, and went on to argue with him at length. And they both benefited from it tremendously with their respective constituents, no doubt.

RCP: Univision anchor Jorge Ramos took on Donald Trump at a press conference held by the Republican presidential candidate in Dubuque, Iowa on Tuesday evening. The two went head to head for five minutes over birthright citizenship, how Trump would build a wall, how he would deport illegal immigrants and more. Trump fought back against Ramos and attempted to get him to acknowledge crime committed by illegal immigrants.
Related links: WATCH: Univision’s Jorge Ramos KICKED OUT of Trump presser
WATCH: Jorge Ramos LET BACK IN Trump presser, goes ROUNDS with Trump over illegal immigration
RUSH: Trump Episode Has Media BAMBOOZLED

ADDENDUM: Rush outed Jorge Ramos for the ACTIVIST, NOT JOURNALIST, that he is this morning...and apparently one with ties to the Clinton campaign!

Ramos is the official news anchor for the illegal invasion...

...so he was DEPORTED! And the NYTimes sides with Trump!

Related link: RUSH: Trump Episode Has Media BAMBOOZLED

ADDENDUM II: GatewayPundit EXPOSES more than just how phony Jorge Ramos is, but the LAWLESSNESS he supports...
Ramos made the TIME Magazine 100 most influential list.
The Mexican-American is a committed open borders leftist.
His daughter works for the Hillary Clinton campaign.

Jorge Ramos also confessed that he still votes in both Mexico and America.
I’ve never ceased to be Mexican. I have two passports, and I vote in elections in both countries. I’m deeply proud of this privileged duality. The best thing about America is its embrace of diversity.

The worst thing about America, of course, is the racist and xenophobic attitudes that tend to emerge now and then — Arizona’s anti-immigrant laws, for example. I hope that one day soon Americans will treat all immigrants, including the 11 million undocumented residents already living in the United States, with the same largess that I experienced when I arrived here.
Related link: Jeffrey Lord just dropped a TRUTH BOMB on CNN

WH, Media will always shout 'gun control' before addressing the slouching society of instability that breeds violence (UPDATE)

A shocking display of a local reporter and her cameraman being gunned down on live tv by a disgruntled former co-worker this morning should have us further questioning the breakdown throughout all facets of our civil society. Instead, 'gun control, gun control!' is the first thing that comes out of this White House (while they're nuking up Iran no less!). You see, they, along with the media, can't credibly address the societal discord when they're major drivers of its permeation, whether that be for votes, ratings, general division or whatnot. So they obfuscate, meander, distract. 

Furthermore, this deadly account blows holes in the racialism of demographic politics and mediaite hegemony alike, because the shooter happened to be a reporter of color who callously filmed himself gunning down the victims to then post on social media! The ugly infatuation with social media...

Now in the short term, a safe bet would be to go with Rush's advice: perhaps it's time for journalists to consider arming themselves?

And perhaps it's just coincidence that this nutjob seemed to be heading towards the direction of the nation's top rabble-rousing domain after doing the deed and evading authorities...

Perhaps as the investigation unfolds, we'll understand more about the motivation. Perhaps not. But what heinous crimes of this intensity continue to display is the progressive heightening of violence and instability boiling over in a slouching society, affecting the mental stability of far too many individuals.

Don't hold your breath waiting for this White House regime or its Pretorian Guard media to address this root cause, though. On the contrary, they'll keep it going. It'll be left to neighbors and communities, churches and local institutions to solve these societal ills, not modern politics or media that simply exploit it.

Virginia reporter, cameraman shot dead
Virginia shooting: Gunman Bryce Williams detained, critical

UPDATE: Oh dear Lord help us...
‘YOU WANT A RACE WAR?’ – Gay black murderer of TV reporters wanted REVENGE for South Carolina Church MASSACRE
A lunatic responding to a lunatic.

Related links: 'Disturbed' Va. gunman angered by Charleston shootings
Murder on social media: Killer wanted the world to watch

ADDENDUM: via Levin...

Today Obama gave a statement in regard to the horrible shooting of a local TV reporter and her cameraman this morning in Roanoke, saying “what we know is that the number of people who die from gun related incidents around this country dwarfs any deaths that happen through terrorism.”

Levin, responding to this statement tonight, said that every time some peice of crap kills innocent people, Democrats want to round up the weapons!

He’s right, it happens every time there’s a shooting and well before we know any of the facts.

Levin wants to know why we can’t have Republicans out there who respond to this drivel like this, saying there is a way to reduce gun violence and it’s called law and order! Levin says we should back the cops rather than undermine them, appoint solid law and order judges and throw the book at criminals! That’s how Republicans should respond!
Related links: Mark Levin explains how Republicans should RESPOND to Obama’s drivel about gun control
Like Vultures, Liberals Circle Virginia Murders