Monday, August 31, 2015

Obama's renaming mountains now...

In yet another act to scoff at a Congress that won't hold him accountable, President Obama takes his executive orders to new heights...literally.
RWNews: The arrogance of this president has reached new heights–if you will–as now Obama thinks he can just start renaming mountains because he feels like it. Over the weekend Obama wiped Alaska’s Mt. McKinley off the map and decided to rename it Mr. Denali.

Mt. McKinley, the tallest mountain in Alaska, has been named after President William McKinley for almost 100 years. But that isn’t good enough for Obama. He has now changed it to Mt. Denali because that is what native Americans called it before Alaska became a state.

As McKinley was from Ohio, both Democrats and Republicans in the Buckeye State are furious with Obama’s pandering to the native Americans.
Ohio lawmakers reacted angrily Sunday to the White House’s announcement that President Obama would formally rename Alaska’s Mt. McKinley — North America’s highest peak — “Denali” during his trip to The Last Frontier this week.

“Mount McKinley … has held the name of our nation’s 25th President for over 100 years,” Rep. Bob Gibbs, R-Ohio, said in a statement. “This landmark is a testament to his countless years of service to our country.” Gibbs also described Obama’s action as “constitutional overreach,” saying that an act of Congress was required to rename the mountain, because a law formally naming it after Ohio’s William McKinley was passed in 1917.

“This political stunt is insulting to all Ohioans, and I will be working with the House Committee on Natural Resources to determine what can be done to prevent this action,” Gibbs said.

The Ohio delegation’s disappointment at the decision cut across party lines.

“We must retain this national landmark’s name in order to honor the legacy of this great American president and patriot,” Democratic Rep. Tim Ryan, whose district includes McKinley’s hometown of Niles, in eastern Ohio.
Amusingly, the Native American word “Denali” means “the high one,” and people are saying that Obama must be “high” to change the name of this mountain just because he feels like it.
What's Boehner gonna do, cry? See what all those rounds of golf have done for you with your good pal? I don't guess any branch of government will ever hold this rogue president accountable...so will future one's receive the same regard? And would Americans really want that?

Hewitt discussed this latest abuse of power with Cruz, who called it "the latest manifestation of the megalomaniacal imperial presidency that we have seen for six and a half years. This administration has been the most lawless administration we've ever seen, and this presidient routinely disregards the law, disregards the Constitution, disregards the Congress..." Cruz continued to remind listeners of Obama's tendencies...
"One of the things that Barack Obama said is, "I am not an emperor." That was his explanation for why he couldn't unilaterally issue amnesty. And then a few months later the election was approaching, and I guess he became an emperor, because he issued the order that he had just said he would have had to be an emperor to issue!"


Question is, though, will Congress do anything about it? Sadly, I think we all know the answer.

Eh, as long as it's just another white man's mark erased, no big deal, right? This president divides daily.

Related links: Sorry, McKinley: Obama orders name change of highest continental peak to “Denali”
Obama goes on climate tour in Alaska, gets called massive hypocrite
OBAMA JOINS CELEBRITY REALITY SURVIVAL SHOW TO HIGHLIGHT CLIMATE CHANGE
THE PRESIDENT’S CLEAN ENERGY FARCE

Thursday, August 27, 2015

The malfeasance of the governing class is why we now need a border fence

...among a laundry list of neglect. But it wasn't always this way from either party, not even so long ago...
The Democrat party has become so radical and un-American that you wouldn’t recognize it 20 years ago. The 1996 Democratic platform stated we must remain a nation of laws and cannot tolerate illegal immigration, but today they say the exact opposite. The same could be said about the Republicans and open-borders Republicans like Jeb Bush, who claim we can’t build a wall because it will cost too much. Fences clearly work and would take pressure off border patrol agents trying to keep up with the flow of illegal immigration. ~ ML, 8/27/15
'Remember when the entire Democratic Party was like Donald Trump?' asks Matt Welch @ Reason. There's much to read (and weep) of the 1996 party platform on immigration, crime, drugs and “zero tolerance”, but here's just a taste...
Here's your who-said-it of the day:
[W]e must remain a nation of laws. We cannot tolerate illegal immigration and we must stop it. For years […], Washington talked tough but failed to act….[O]ur borders might as well not have existed. The border was under-patrolled, and what patrols there were, were under-equipped. Drugs flowed freely. Illegal immigration was rampant. Criminal immigrants, deported after committing crimes in America, returned the very next day to commit crimes again.
OK, so the headline gives it away, but that's the Democratic Party's official platform for 1996. Mirroring that year's Republican platform, which was arguably the most stringent anti-illegal-immigration tract in the GOP's modern history, the Dem document is filled with tough talk...
Now, not only have Democrats made a complete 180 from that platform (and constituency), but the GOP cowers from this tough LAWFUL talk as well (mostly in fear of campaign coffers affected).

If Jeb Bush can put his other grand ideas down for just a moment, along with much of the rest of the GOP, and the entirety of Washington for that matter, Democrats included, let's pretend as if we believe in national sovereignty again, because Daniel Horowitz makes a compelling case for the Border Fence (yes, the one Congress already passed to create, but never funded!)...

CR: Yes, border fences work. And that is exactly why the political class is so stridently intent on opposing the construction of a full double-layered fence or any effective barrier at the border.

The bipartisan open borders cartel is all in favor of discussing sundry forms of “border security,” especially if it will afford them the political cover to pass amnesty. But the one tangible form of border security they will never support, and in fact, pull out all stops to prevent, is the completion of the border fence.

Several weeks ago, Jeb Bush released his amnesty plan. In order to grease the skids for his amnesty proposal, Jeb released a “six point plan” for securing the border. The one thing that is missing, of course, is the competition of the double-layered security fence.

One of the most pervasive arguments against a border fence is the puerile nursery chant, “show me a 20-foot fence, I’ll show you a 21-foot ladder.” Even 2016 presidential candidate Rick Perry is oft to advance this intellectually dishonest argument. The problem is they can’t show us the 21-foot ladder. The border fence that conservatives are advocating has worked in San Diego and it has worked in Israel. It will work for much of the rest of the border.
This detailed piece goes on with further analysis, examples and other imperative information towards the very realistic (yes, Jorge Ramos) border fence. But perhaps the last section puts the true cost and necessity for such a structure into perspective...
Will a border fence cost money? Will it look aesthetically unpleasing in some places? Sure, but the cost of illegal immigration on our welfare, education, hospitals, criminal justice system, highway safety, drug violence, and culture is incalculable and infinite. And the sight of dead bodies and drug smugglers is more offensive than a security barrier. ...

Ideally, we should not need a full security fence at our southern border. As Moses observed when the Jews were conquering the land of Canaan, the weaker cities were the ones encompassed by a wall while the stronger ones were confident in their prowess for defense. And indeed, if we had a country that actually enforced our laws, cut off the magnets, and held the government of Mexico accountable for their violation of our sovereignty, we wouldn’t need a wall. But we are not a strong country at a political level. In fact, we have a weak and malfeasant governing class. We therefore need a border fence.
And that's the reality of the matter...if only either side of the aisle in Washington had the will to acknowledge their malfeasance and reverse course. But for some reason, the pro-illegal detriments wager more time, attention and money (suckage) with the D.C. crowd than the pro-citizenry benefits, and in that, America continues to be destroyed from within.

Related link: REPORT: EVERY DEPORTED ILLEGAL HOUSEHOLD SAVES TAXPAYERS MORE THAN $700,000

Another end-run around the GOP Senate: Obama pushes for Iran nuke filibuster

President Obama is scheming with Senate democrats to use a filibuster to prevent a vote on the Iran nuclear agreement. If Mitch McConnell were any kind of leader he would’ve suspended the filibuster for the remainder of Obama’s presidency. ~ ML, 8/27/15
And once again, McConnell and GOP leadership are outmaneuvered by Dem bulbs that everybody outside of Washington had the ability to see coming a mile away. What the hell, Republicans?
Politico: President Barack Obama’s almost certain to get the Iran nuclear deal through Congress — but whether he gets there by filibuster or sustained veto could make all the difference.

A Democratic filibuster in the Senate would be a clear victory for the president, allowing Obama to say that for all the political noise there wasn’t enough actual opposition to the nuclear agreement with the Islamic republic to even get to a final vote.
Levin blasted the GOP tonight, save for one member...
TRS: Obama is trying to turn the tables on Republicans, pushing for a filibuster of the Iran disapproval vote in the Senate so that the up or down vote that he agreed to earlier this year doesn’t even happen. Of course! Republicans made a deal with the devil and now it looks like they are gonna get burned. Corker is angry. So what.

Mark Levin has warned Republicans that Obama couldn’t be trusted on this, as he pointed out tonight, but the Senate GOP leadership and all but one Republican voted to give away the Senate’s power to approve this deal.



I know Ted Cruz said he supported the deal because at least it would give him a chance to vote on the deal. See how that is working out? And he’s got no one to blame but himself and his fellow Republicans if Democrats end up filibustering this vote.

Only Tom Cotton did the right thing here. How pathetic is that?
Truth hurts.

Is it too much to ask Congress to reassert its constitutional authority? Apparently so, even under the weakest president in U.S. history, when you're led by weaker legislative leadership.

Related links: AWESOME: Cruz and Trump joining forces to protest Iran deal at Capitol Hill rally
Kerry signs UN gun ban 'treaty' against U.S. Senate wishes...and the Constitution!

Following lib logic, isn't this flag responsible for murder? (ADDENDUMS)

The shooting in Charleston, liberals insisted, was because of a flag and they systematically started immediately, with the assistance of duped Republicans, to remove not only the flags from everywhere they could find one but also any vestiges of Confederate history. Why? Because they told us all that if there were no more Confederate flags, that would prevent the next shooting. And how did that work out? ~ Craig Andresen, The National Patriot, 'Like Vultures, Liberals Circle Virginia Murders'
We all saw how, this piece o' excrement made certain of that. And it would appear that this maniac had a hate-flag of his own in his Virginia apartment. So by liberal standards, shouldn't we be inundated with calls to take down this flag by now?
Breitbart: The Daily Telegraph has learned that “police reportedly confiscated a gay pride flag” from the apartment of Vester Lee Flanagan Wednesday. In an apparent hate crime, Flanagan is the 41 year-old black journalist who murdered two white Virginia reporters on live television Wednesday morning before turning his gun on himself.

In a manifesto faxed to ABC News, Flanagan, an Obama-supporter, claimed that his motive involved a “race war.” Flanagan was black and gay and apparently angered by the fact that he had been a victim of racism and homophobia at the hands of “black men and white women.”

Both of Flanagan’s intended victims were straight.

The gay pride rainbow flag reportedly found in Flanagan’s apartment is seen by many as a symbol of anti-Christian hate.

After a white racist terrorist in South Carolina murdered nine innocent black churchgoers, photos of the racist with the Confederate Flag resulted in a media frenzy to ban the flag.

Like the Confederate flag, the provocative gay pride flag, a symbol of religious oppression, has flown on government property.

The Confederate Flag has since been taken down in South Carolina.

Thus far, other than a mention in the Telegraph, the media has not reported on the fact that Flanagan might have owned the LGBT rainbow hate-flag.
...crickets...

Shhh...don't blow the facade! Fact is, same as with the gun grabbers, the feigned outrage is only dependent on the political expedient.
From Matt Walsh: "It will be interesting to see how quickly this shooting disappears from the headlines now that we know the killer was a racist black gay man." ~ via Steve Deace FB page
At this point, it wouldn't surprise me at all if this White House found it appropriate to re-illuminate in mourning.

ADDENDUM: Oh, and about that Obama support...
Does that mean his Obama advocacy had anything to do with the murders? No. But you can be damn sure that if he had been a Tea Party fan, they would have been more than happy to plaster that all over the headlines.
ADDENDUM II: The mainstream media silence is deafening in its BIAS...they just COMPLETELY IGNORE the fact that the VA shooter was a gay, black Obama supporter...
GatewayPundit: Black hustler and reporter Vester Flanagan was an Angry Barack Obama Democrat.
** He was reprimanded for wearing a Barack Obama sticker at work.
** He had his racial suits tossed from court
** He was a “high paid companion“
** He attempted to subpoena personnel records on both of his victims

Then he shot two white reporters dead—

Killer Vester Flanagan was a big Obama supporter.
** He was written up in November 2012 for wearing a Barack Obama sticker.

But you would not know Flanagan was an Obama supporter and Democrat from the US mainstream media.
The US media completely ignored these facts. It didn’t fit their narrative.

Not a single US mainstream media outlet stressed that Flanagan was a radical gay Obama-supporting Democrat. If it was mentioned it was buried deep in their reports.

This is what you call “Democrat Privilege” and it is real.
America, you just got duped again.

Wednesday, August 26, 2015

Kerry signs UN gun ban 'treaty' against U.S. Senate wishes...and the Constitution!

Well, that didn't take long, undoubtedly with Obama's pen and phone. So, now they want to use the word treaty...
RWNews: If U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry has his way the United Nations will be able to say if Americans are allowed to have their Second Amendment rights. He has just signed an anti-gun treaty with the United Nations that the U.S. Senate has already said it is against.

The treaty Kerry signed without authorization from the Senate would create an un-Constitutional registry of all US gun buyers and would lead to the UN controlling American’s gun rights.
Secretary of State John Kerry on Wednesday signed a controversial U.N. treaty on arms regulation, riling U.S. lawmakers who vow the Senate will not ratify the agreement.

As he signed the document, Kerry called the treaty a “significant step” in addressing illegal gun sales, while claiming it would also protect gun rights.

“This is about keeping weapons out of the hands of terrorists and rogue actors. This is about reducing the risk of international transfers of conventional arms that will be used to carry out the world’s worst crimes. This is about keeping Americans safe and keeping America strong,” he said. “This treaty will not diminish anyone’s freedom. In fact, the treaty recognizes the freedom of both individuals and states to obtain, possess, and use arms for legitimate purposes.”

U.S. lawmakers, though, have long claimed the treaty could lead to new gun control measures. They note the U.S. Senate has final say on whether to approve the agreement.

Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., in a letter to President Obama, urged his administration not to take any action to implement the treaty without the consent of the Senate.

He claimed the treaty raises “fundamental issues” concerning “individual rights protected by the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution.”

The National Rifle Association blasted the plan, claiming it would impose an “invasive registration scheme” by requiring importing countries to give exporting countries information on “end users.”

“The Obama administration is once again demonstrating its contempt for our fundamental, individual Right to Keep and Bear Arms,” Chris Cox, executive director of the NRA’s Institute for Legislative Action, said in a statement. “These are blatant attacks on the constitutional rights and liberties of every law-abiding American. The NRA will continue to fight this assault on our fundamental freedom.”
Once again Obama’s regime tries to end the Second Amendment by stealth.
Corker, when the hell are you gonna get a clue and understand that no matter how nice you are to this president, his regime, his party, they will continue to tear apart our constitutional rights. Disarming us, but nuking up our enemies! Madness.

As Levin said today, that pen & phone are looking more like a hammer & sickle every day.

Sound advice for the black community from the black community

Came across these over the past few days and WOW! Here's some refreshingly sound advice for the black community from the black community, particularly in lieu of the lackluster racialists who have failed this community and led astray for far too long (including the current occupant in the Oval Office)...

First, presidential candidate Ben Carson says that #BlackLivesMatter has critically misfired, that 'our righteous anger is misdirected at politically convenient targets, not the real culprits,' and suggests in a USAToday op-ed where the marches should take place:
Let’s head down to the board of education. Teaching is a tough job and thank God there was a teacher who convinced me that I was not dumb, but our schools are failing and we have no power to abandon them. The actions of rogue police officers take black lives one at a time. Our public school system has destroyed black lives not in the ones and twos, but in whole generations.

The schools don’t teach and our children don’t learn. Too many public schools are controlled by teachers unions focused more on the convenience and compensation of adults rather than the education of children who started out far behind. Their failures don't kill as quickly, but they do kill as surely as a bullet.

Let’s confront the entertainment industry that lines its pockets by glamorizing a life where black men are thugs and our women are trash. Let’s tell them we plan to start talking with our wallets.

It is time for them to pick on someone else because we have had enough. Demeaning women is not art, and it shouldn’t be profitable. Neither is glorifying violence and equating prison time with authenticity. Straight Outta Compton, #1 in movie theaters, is just the latest example. You only have to watch the trailers.

Let’s go down to city hall. Living behind a door with three deadbolts is not living in freedom. Being too scared to walk around your block at night is not the pursuit of happiness we were all promised.

Let's go over to the crack house. We need to tear it down. Profiting from selling poison to our children and destroying lives must not be the ambition of our children. These monuments to our destruction deserve our active scorn not our silent acceptance.

We should go to Washington. For decades they have fought the "War on Poverty." Poverty won. We lost.

Over 19 trillion dollars has been wasted, but can anyone identify a single battle won as a result? We certainly have not helped the poor “lift themselves out of the ruts of poverty” as Lyndon Johnson promised — far from it. These programs have been a great American failure.

We should have a talk with the Democratic Party. Let's tell them, we don’t want to be clothed, fed and housed. We want honor and dignity.

We don't want a plan to give us public housing in nice neighborhoods. We want an end to excuses for schools that leave us without the means to buy our own houses where we choose to live. We want the skills needed to compete, not a consolation prize of Section 8, Food Stamps and a lifetime of government paperwork.

Finally, we need to go over to the Republican Party. We need to tell them they have ignored us for too long. They need to invite us in and listen to us. We need to communicate and find a different way.
Related link: Ben Carson on Kelly File: Taking on the real problems in Black America

Then there's Peggy Hubbard. She's not a politician, she's not running for anything, she not famous, well wasn't until now. Peggy is a black mom who's had enough and has lit up the internet by speaking hard TRUTH to the hypocrisy of #BlackLivesMatter and the black community in general...
TRS: This video from Peggy Hubbard has over seven MILLION views after she absolutely TORCHES the “Black Lives Matter” movement by pointing out that black lives don’t matter to other blacks.



Dayammmm, Peggy drops some real wisdom in this video! To be sure, she does not say that police brutality is nonexistent, but she simply points out that it’s somewhat hypocritical to be marching that “black lives matter” when many more blacks are murdered by evil scumbags in their own community, than by any white cops, or police of any color.

Good for Peggy – if we had decent human beings like her in every community, our country would be immensely better. And by the views she’s getting, it’s clear that many agree with her.
Related link: BITE ME! – Black grandmother responds to racist ‘Black Lives Matter’ jerks who call her an ‘Uncle Tom’

Consider this, think on it, pray.

#StopTheViolence #AllLivesMatter

Related link: New ‘Common Core’ approved textbook will indoctrinate SIXTH-GRADERS about ‘BLACK LIVES MATTER’

Go back to Univision, Jorge: 101 in commanding a presser, while taking on pro-illegal mouthpiece (ADDENDUMS)

Folks, this should be a primer for every candidate out there, and a lesson for activist journalists, on how media bias can be dealt with. And for better or worse, this has MUCH to do with where Trump is in the polls. Despite a checkered record within the spectrum of conservatism, a candidate that can unapologetically hand the lib press their lunch is a win in the mad-as-hell camp...
RCP: Univision anchor Jorge Ramos stood up at the beginning of Donald Trump's press conference and yelled a question at him. Trump ordered him to sit down and had him escorted out of the room. He was later allowed back in to ask his question in turn.
HotAir: Alternate headline: “Trump rises another 10 points in Republican polls.”

When reporters first started huffing about this on Twitter, it sounded as though Trump had booted this guy out of the room for doing nothing more than asking him a question he didn’t care for, an ominous sign from a would-be president who’s building a reputation for holding grudges. But that’s not what happened. Ramos, true to form, simply stood up and started grandstanding about deportation as Trump tried to call on another reporter. He’s the most shameless amnesty shill in American media and makes no apologies for it; his advice to colleagues in journalism is “Don’t be neutral. Neutrality is for referees in a football game.” He’s an activist for a cause more than a reporter. When someone fitting that description stands up at a public event and begins talking over the speaker, there’s a word for it: Heckling. And hecklers get tossed. That’s what happened here.

Trump eventually let him back in the room, if only to spare America the ordeal of endless think pieces tomorrow about Jorge Ramos’s sacred First Amendment right to talk over everyone in the room at a press conference, and went on to argue with him at length. And they both benefited from it tremendously with their respective constituents, no doubt.

RCP: Univision anchor Jorge Ramos took on Donald Trump at a press conference held by the Republican presidential candidate in Dubuque, Iowa on Tuesday evening. The two went head to head for five minutes over birthright citizenship, how Trump would build a wall, how he would deport illegal immigrants and more. Trump fought back against Ramos and attempted to get him to acknowledge crime committed by illegal immigrants.
Related links: WATCH: Univision’s Jorge Ramos KICKED OUT of Trump presser
WATCH: Jorge Ramos LET BACK IN Trump presser, goes ROUNDS with Trump over illegal immigration
RUSH: Trump Episode Has Media BAMBOOZLED

ADDENDUM: Rush outed Jorge Ramos for the ACTIVIST, NOT JOURNALIST, that he is this morning...and apparently one with ties to the Clinton campaign!



Ramos is the official news anchor for the illegal invasion...



...so he was DEPORTED! And the NYTimes sides with Trump!



Related link: RUSH: Trump Episode Has Media BAMBOOZLED

ADDENDUM II: GatewayPundit EXPOSES more than just how phony Jorge Ramos is, but the LAWLESSNESS he supports...
Ramos made the TIME Magazine 100 most influential list.
The Mexican-American is a committed open borders leftist.
His daughter works for the Hillary Clinton campaign.

Jorge Ramos also confessed that he still votes in both Mexico and America.
I’ve never ceased to be Mexican. I have two passports, and I vote in elections in both countries. I’m deeply proud of this privileged duality. The best thing about America is its embrace of diversity.

The worst thing about America, of course, is the racist and xenophobic attitudes that tend to emerge now and then — Arizona’s anti-immigrant laws, for example. I hope that one day soon Americans will treat all immigrants, including the 11 million undocumented residents already living in the United States, with the same largess that I experienced when I arrived here.
Related link: Jeffrey Lord just dropped a TRUTH BOMB on CNN

WH, Media will always shout 'gun control' before addressing the slouching society of instability that breeds violence (UPDATE)

A shocking display of a local reporter and her cameraman being gunned down on live tv by a disgruntled former co-worker this morning should have us further questioning the breakdown throughout all facets of our civil society. Instead, 'gun control, gun control!' is the first thing that comes out of this White House (while they're nuking up Iran no less!). You see, they, along with the media, can't credibly address the societal discord when they're major drivers of its permeation, whether that be for votes, ratings, general division or whatnot. So they obfuscate, meander, distract. 

Furthermore, this deadly account blows holes in the racialism of demographic politics and mediaite hegemony alike, because the shooter happened to be a reporter of color who callously filmed himself gunning down the victims to then post on social media! The ugly infatuation with social media...

Now in the short term, a safe bet would be to go with Rush's advice: perhaps it's time for journalists to consider arming themselves?





And perhaps it's just coincidence that this nutjob seemed to be heading towards the direction of the nation's top rabble-rousing domain after doing the deed and evading authorities...


Perhaps as the investigation unfolds, we'll understand more about the motivation. Perhaps not. But what heinous crimes of this intensity continue to display is the progressive heightening of violence and instability boiling over in a slouching society, affecting the mental stability of far too many individuals.

Don't hold your breath waiting for this White House regime or its Pretorian Guard media to address this root cause, though. On the contrary, they'll keep it going. It'll be left to neighbors and communities, churches and local institutions to solve these societal ills, not modern politics or media that simply exploit it.

Related links: GRAPHIC: SHOCKING COMPLETE VIDEO SHOT FROM VIRGINIA GUNMAN’S POINT OF VIEW
Virginia reporter, cameraman shot dead
Virginia shooting: Gunman Bryce Williams detained, critical

UPDATE: Oh dear Lord help us...
‘YOU WANT A RACE WAR?’ – Gay black murderer of TV reporters wanted REVENGE for South Carolina Church MASSACRE
A lunatic responding to a lunatic.

Related links: 'Disturbed' Va. gunman angered by Charleston shootings
Murder on social media: Killer wanted the world to watch

ADDENDUM: via Levin...

Today Obama gave a statement in regard to the horrible shooting of a local TV reporter and her cameraman this morning in Roanoke, saying “what we know is that the number of people who die from gun related incidents around this country dwarfs any deaths that happen through terrorism.”

Levin, responding to this statement tonight, said that every time some peice of crap kills innocent people, Democrats want to round up the weapons!

He’s right, it happens every time there’s a shooting and well before we know any of the facts.

Levin wants to know why we can’t have Republicans out there who respond to this drivel like this, saying there is a way to reduce gun violence and it’s called law and order! Levin says we should back the cops rather than undermine them, appoint solid law and order judges and throw the book at criminals! That’s how Republicans should respond!
Related links: Mark Levin explains how Republicans should RESPOND to Obama’s drivel about gun control
Like Vultures, Liberals Circle Virginia Murders

Tuesday, August 25, 2015

The authentic crazies of the ObamaNuke pact with Iran

While people are saying, “There is peace and security,” then sudden destruction will come upon them as labor pains come upon a pregnant woman, and they will not escape. ~ 1 Thessalonians 5:3

“Our positions against the usurper Zionist regime have not changed at all; Israel should be annihilated and this is our ultimate slogan.” ~ Hussein Sheikholeslam, senior Iranian official
Thousands of years of Scripture has warned us of such moments, but no, these obvious fanatics are somehow the normal people in Obama's mind. Apparently, those of us who want to keep nukes out of the hands of terrorist-supporting regimes like the one in Tehran, well, we're the 'crazies'. No, the authentic crazy is occupying the White House....
DailyCaller: Fresh off of a two-week vacation in Martha’s Vineyard, President Barack Obama went on the offensive Monday against opponents of his Iran nuclear deal during a fundraiser in Las Vegas for the Democrat tapped to run for Nevada Sen. Harry Reid’s seat next year.

Telling of his limo ride to the event with Reid, Obama said he and the Senate minority leader “were doing a little reminiscing and then figuring out how we’re going to deal with the crazies in terms of managing some problems.”

According to Politico, the “crazies” Obama was referring to are the opponents of the administration’s plan to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. That opposition group includes mostly Republicans, but also several key Democrats, such as New York Sen. Chuck Schumer, who has been tapped to replace Reid as the top Democrat in the Senate.

Opponents of the deal, which will remove sanctions against Iran in exchange for it curtailing its production of uranium, say that it provides for little oversight of the Islamic regime.

Obama’s remarks are just the latest in a series of aggressive rhetorical attacks on lawmakers who oppose the nuclear pact.
He gives more respect to Tehran and the Ayatollah than the American citizenry and its elected officials. Undoubtedly, what Obama is doing is enriching Iran...
By making Iran indispensible to its own nuclear limitation, Iran has fulfilled its original nuclear objectives: the West’s acquiescence—and even facilitation—of its regional hegemonic ambitions. In return for temporary enrichment restraints, the deal fuels Iran’s conventional capabilities and greases Iran’s path to power.
And he gladly does it, not just over America's best interest (as usual), but to our own detriment (not to mention our allies) that can easily be exemplified with ludicrous side deals, like allowing Iran to inspect its own nuke sites!
Iran will be allowed to use its own inspectors to investigate a site it has been accused of using to develop nuclear arms, operating under a secret agreement with the U.N. agency that normally carries out such work, according to a document seen by The Associated Press. The revelation on Wednesday newly riled Republican lawmakers in the U.S. who have been severely critical of a broader agreement to limit Iran's future nuclear programs, signed by the Obama administration, Iran and five world powers in July. Those critics have complained that the wider deal is unwisely built on trust of the Iranians, while the administration has insisted it depends on reliable inspections.
Related link: Text of draft agreement between IAEA, Iran on inspections at Parchin military site

Levin has continued sounding the alarm week after week on these shenanigans...
"One of the side deals to the Iran nuclear agreement has been leaked, and it allows Iran to self-inspect nuclear sites. Even worse: John Kerry was briefed on the deal and endorsed it, probably without even reading it." ~ ML, 8/19/15

"It’s no wonder why the Obama administration tried so hard to keep the secret side deals to the Iran deal quiet now that we’re learning what’s in them. Anyone who votes for the Iran deal is undermining American security and ensuring a nuclear Islamo-nazi regime." ~ ML, 8/20/15

President Obama isn’t brave at all, but a sellout. Obama wants a deal with Iran to claim he created peace in the Middle East, but he knows in 15 years the top comes off the deal. Groups in the Senate and House are trying to get enough votes to stop the deal, but the time to do it was before the Senate surrendered treaty powers to Obama. ~ ML, 8/24/15
Meanwhile, quislings like Jeb Bush and Mitch McConnell can't even come out against it and are already waving the white flag in efforts to torpedo the ObamaNuke pact, while less than a handful of Democrats play brave protagonists against Obama's deal in an effort to save their political hides (if they actually thought the vote was closer, you can guarantee they'd put party first). And as we should all understand by now, the GOP acquiesced when they surrendered their treaty powers to Obama, with all indications pointing to Obama likely doing the deal even if Congress disapproves. Essentially, without a super-majority to override a presidential veto, they nuked their own ability to fight this reemerging tyranny, endangering not only our allies in Israel, but passing it all off for future generations to deal with. Such leadership...or rather more crazies to join the head lunatic (and I'm not referring to the one in Iran).

New Video: PlannedParenthood, StemExpress discuss intact fetuses, shipping baby heads, 'another 50 livers/week', and fiscal growth of abortion clinics

As macabre as it is, folks, acknowledgement and exposure are the only ways we get to the truth...and, with God's Help, the inevitable goal of ending these sanctioned atrocities...
TRS: A new video is out today from Center for Medical Progress that features StemExpress CEO talking about the need for baby livers to meet their high demands, as well as how they get a lot of ‘intact’ babies. She also talks about how they get requests for neural tissue and how it’s the hardest thing in the world to ship, so it’s best to ship the entire baby’s head. The CMP guy jokes about making sure the baby’s eyes are closed, to which the CEO responds “Tell the lab it’s coming so they don’t open the box and go ‘oh god'”. Ugh.



CMP: The eighth video in the ongoing controversy over Planned Parenthood’s sale of aborted fetal body parts shows the CEO of StemExpress, LLC, a major buyer of fetal tissue from Planned Parenthood, admitting the company gets “a lot” of intact fetuses, suggesting “another 50 livers a week” would not be enough, and agreeing abortion clinics should profit from the sale.
A for-profit supporting a supposed non-profit...hmmm. And about that non-profit (via TheFederalist):
Planned Parenthood is designated a non-profit by the Internal Revenue Service. Its president makes more than half a million dollars a year, its budget is more than $1 billion, and it gets more than half a billion dollars in taxpayer funding annually, but it’s a non-profit.
Contradictions and conflicts of interests, much?!

#DefundPlannedParenthood

LEVIN: 'Young people DON’T REALIZE that the gov’t is STEALING from them every day'

Young people must be shaken awake to the realization that this federal Leviathan is stealing from their future every day, every hour, every minute, every second...


DailySignal: Popular radio show host Mark Levin says when it comes to out of control entitlement spending, the federal government is “stealing from unborn babies.”

“Future generations don’t vote, they don’t exist yet so they keep stealing from them,” Levin explains to The Daily Signal. “They keep robbing from them which means they are going to have limited liberty, they’re going to have limited opportunity, limited wealth creation and we’re spending it all today … we are stealing from unborn babies.”

Levin details the problem in his new book, “Plunder and Deceit: Big Government’s Exploitation of Young People and the Future.” While Levin has written books before about the woes of a massive federal bureaucracy, this new venture aims directly at the younger generation and the impact it will have on them, especially when it comes to federal spending on entitlements.

“My concern is that your children and my children are going to be left holding the bag and there will be no way out.”

Levin points out how the two Social Security trust funds used to pay out benefits essentially have no money in them, filled with a bunch of IOU notes.

“I don’t even think people who receive these benefits know what’s going on. Many of them don’t know that the money doesn’t exist. All that money that they paid into the system, there is no system. That money was taken and it was spent the second it was taken on other government projects and other government programs.”

Levin says he’s sick and tired of establishment politicians talking about the need to reform entitlement spending. He says there are always plenty of proposals out there but President Barack Obama and GOP leadership don’t want to touch them.

“If we don’t start discussing them then those who claim to defend these programs, they’re the ones who are going to be responsible for their collapse.”
It's also time for older generations to demand responsibility of both the politicians and themselves that still benefit from these federal entitlement programs. The incessant drain on these systems is leaving little of nothing for future generations. Rather than forcing young people into more debt to cover the same broken systems, it's time to demand alternatives...and preferably constitutional and non-socialized ones at that.

H/t: TRS

Monday, August 24, 2015

American households just saw $1.8 trillion in wealth vanish as stocks plummet

"I will say that China’s markets still are pretty much separated from world markets. They’re, obviously, moving towards being more integrated, but right now they’re not. So you’re not going to, I don’t think, see the direct linkage there." ~ Jack Lew, Obama's Treasury Secretary, 7/10/15

"THE HELL YOU SAY!" ~ NYSE, 8/24/15
Looks like the roller coaster ride is here (again)...
AP: U.S. stocks slumped again Monday, with the Dow Jones industrial average plunging more than 1,000 points at one point in a sell-off that sent a shiver of fear from Wall Street to Main Street.

Stocks regained some of that ground as the day wore on, but the Dow Jones industrial average finished the day down 588 points. The slump - part of a global wave of selling triggered by the slowdown in China - reflected uncertainty among investors over where to put their money when the world's second-largest economy is in a slide.

MarketWatch: Wall Street suffered one of its most volatile sessions in years Monday, with the Dow industrials plunging more than 1,000 points in the opening minutes, bouncing back to recover most of the losses and then fading into the final bell to record the biggest drop in four years.
All these years of dependence on and borrowing from China, and they've been inflating their numbers. Here's putting the last few trading days losses in perspective: American households just saw $1.8 trillion in wealth vanish.
MarketWatch: You may have seen headlines to describe the market carnage like a trillion dollar’s worth of wealth wiped away in a single day. But it’s worth noting just how much is held by Americans in the stock market in the first place.

MarketWatch took a look at the Federal Reserve’s financial accounts of the United States report for answers — and did some back-of-the-envelope math.

As of March 31, households and nonprofits held $24.1 trillion in stocks. That’s both directly, and through mutual funds, pension funds and the like. That also includes the holdings of U.S.-based hedge funds, though you’d have to think that most hedge funds are held by households.

Using the Dow Jones Total Stock Market index DWCF, -3.94% through midmorning trade, that number had dropped to $22.32 trillion.

In other words, a cool $1.8 trillion has been lost between now and the first quarter — and overwhelmingly, those losses occurred in the last few days. This will probably be the worst quarter for stock-market destruction since the third quarter of 2011, when $2.8 trillion was wiped away.

It took four quarters for the stock market to bake that wealth back into equities.
The crony corporatists, the WallStreet hedgers, all intertwined in the statist Leviathan of Big Government's Keynesian economics (i.e., Obamanomics) down the crapper. Of course, the titans will land on their feet when it's everybody else's money that's being flushed away with manufacturing, jobs, employment, savings and retirement...and somehow it'll still be Bush's fault.

Related links: Stock markets slide after China’s ‘Black Monday’
The Stock Market is tanking this morning, Donald Trump says US needs to get SMART
Why China's Economy is Scaring the World, Explained in 90 Seconds
Fresh Off 17 Day Vacation, Obama Flies Out This Morning To Las Vegas Fundraiser
The Obama Economy Calls to Clinton and Biden

ADDENDUM: Levin explains how it's not just about China...
"The only thing that has been growing with fake dollars, thanks to the Federal Reserve, is the stock market. Nothing else has been growing. Jobs aren't growing; housing market's not growing. Nothing's growing, and now the stock market's in trouble, not because of China, because the Federal Reserves out of control, because Obama's out of control, because the bureaucracy's out of control, because Congress is out of control. They won't put the breaks on this profligate, unconscionable, immoral spending! They won't get out of the way of the private economy."

Wednesday, August 19, 2015

National Suicide: This is not immigration and there is no birthright citizenship (ADDENDUMS)

“Every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction is, by virtue of natural law and national law, a citizen of the [United States]. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers, accredited to the government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons.” ~ Senator Jacob Howard (R-MI), author of Citizenship Clause, 1866
There is the law and their is either the enforcement of or the lawlessness allowed. It's not xenophobic, bigoted or racist to point out. It's the truth, and the laws on the books support it (which is likely why crooked politicians in DC want it 'reformed').

Here's how this needs to be understood, as explained by Rush and Levin, as well as how it needs to go...

This is not immigration; this is an INVASION.



Related link: RUSH: WE’RE BEING INVADED! This Is Not Immigration… These Are Refugees

We're importing the Third DAMN World!



Turn'em around, kick'em in the ass, and send'em home.



Levin thoroughly explained birthright citizenship last night and why Congress can end it without ever having to consider amending the Constitution or even creating more 'comprehensive immigration reform' over existing law.
On Tuesday’s Mark Levin Show: The argument that an illegal alien can step into the United States, claim legal and political jurisdiction, and confer citizenship to their child is insane. People claiming to be Constitutional experts saying that the 14th Amendment allows birthright citizenship are dead wrong. The 14th Amendment didn’t even give citizenship to Native Americans, why would it give citizenship to illegal aliens? The Constitution is on our side in a second way: Article 1 Section 8, which grants plenary power to Congress to establish a uniform rule of naturalization. We’re tired of being told someone can come into our country illegally, claim citizenship, and we’re told there’s nothing we can do about it. We have policies that promote illegal aliens and illegal alien children more than the American citizen and American child – we’re committing national suicide.

Related link: Mark Levin: Congress can end birthright citizenship without amending the Constitution

This is simple enough for even Harry Reid to have gotten before he & his party decided to play politics with it (of which both sides now play politics with)...



Just ENFORCE the damn law! Done. (see how Eisenhower did)

Related links: Birthright Citizenship and the Constitution
Fixing the Birthright Citizenship Loophole: Myth vs Fact
14th Amendment Doesn't Make Illegal Aliens' Children Citizens
Before the Subcommittee on Immigration and Claims (June 25, 1997)

ADDENDUM: Levin continued to press the point throughout Wednesday evening...


On Wednesday’s Mark Levin Show: It’s time to go on the offensive about birthright citizenship. Congress has the broadest power under the Constitution to pass a statute and put an end to birthright citizenship; they have the final say and it’s time they did something. It’s amazing how people push birthright citizenship policy and pretend the Constitution is on their side and we’re the ones that have to amend it, when in reality it’s the other way around.
Related links: LEVIN: CRUZ, TRUMP, SESSIONS ‘ARE RIGHT,’ 14TH AMENDMENT DOESN’T MANDATE BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP
Mark Levin defends Rand Paul over new controversy
Trump’s Critics Are Wrong about the Fourteenth Amendment and Birthright Citizenship
Mark Levin NAILS birthright citizenship and Hillary Clinton all in one Hannity interview

ADDENDUM II: It's quite apparent that the U.S. is almost alone in the developed world when it comes to granting so-called birthright citizenship. Notice how the only qualities of exceptionalism that leftists want to apply to America are to her detriment?
Breitbart: While the left has attacked the idea of ending birthright citizenship in the U.S. as “extreme,” globally the U.S. is one of few countries that actually grant automatic citizenship at birth to illegal immigrants.

As reports have indicated, the U.S. and Canada are the only two developed nations that grant automatic citizenship at birth to the children of illegal and temporary immigrants.

Last summer NumbersUSA investigated where countries across the globe stand on the issue of conferring automatic citizenship at birth to anyone born within their territories, also known as “jus soli” (a Latin term meaning “right of the soil”).

According to NumbersUSA’s list, the vast majority of counties do not adhere to jus soli. Of their list of about 190 countries, just 33 (including the U.S. and Canada) had a such a policy.
The ruse becomes quite clear when the same people who refer to babies in the womb as 'tissue mass' now feign offense at the quite accurate description of the 'anchor baby' phenomenon...

On Thursday’s Mark Levin Show: Leading Republicans and TV hosts keep spewing inaccuracies about the 14th Amendment and birthright citizenship because they want us to act as if there’s nothing we can do and move on. Now the term anchor baby is being called offensive by the left; it’s because the words have meaning and explain exactly what’s going on. Once a child becomes of age, they can import close family members – also known as chain migration.
Related links: Trump could boost bill ending birthright citizenship
TRUMP, REPORTER SPAR OVER TERM ‘ANCHOR BABY’
Jeb Bush discusses anchor babies on Bill Bennett's Morning America
Bobby Jindal hits Hillary: She doesn’t like ‘anchor babies’ but unborn babies are fetal tissue?
WHAT ARE THE GOP CANDIDATES SAYING ABOUT BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP?