AP: The Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld Michigan's ban on using race as a factor in college admissions.Imagine that, a path away from quotas and towards colorless qualification. Seems like something the utopians should be able to jump on. But then, as Justice Kennedy’s argument proclaimed, "Courts may not disempower the voters from choosing which path to follow," shouldn't that weigh equally with California's Prop 8 or Arizona's immigration enforcement? Yes, it should...but then that would solely depend on a consistent Supreme Court, which I've never experienced in my lifetime.
The justices said in a 6-2 ruling that Michigan voters had the right to change their state constitution in 2006 to prohibit public colleges and universities from taking account of race in admissions decisions. The justices said that a lower federal court was wrong to set aside the change as discriminatory.
Justice Anthony Kennedy said voters chose to eliminate racial preferences, presumably because such a system could give rise to race-based resentment.
Kennedy said nothing in the Constitution or the court's prior cases gives judges the authority to undermine the election results.
Let's just hope this decision broadens beyond merely college admissions.
Related links: Supreme Court upholds MI ban on affirmative action in college admissions
Michigan’s Affirmative Action Ban Easily Upheld at SCOTUS; Media Go with the ‘Sharply Divided’ Meme