...it's obvious that our federal government while under the reign of Barack Obama has no intention of preventing this kind of horror. None!So not only were these two jihadis watching ISIS propaganda videos, but apparently the female jihadi pledged allegiance to ISIS during the actual attack...
Well you can thank Obama partly for this, for both helping create ISIS in 2012 and for not taking out ISIS when he had the chance in 2014 and earlier this year. Yes, the blood of these innocent Americans are in part on his hands and it cannot be denied.
Instead of taking responsibility for what’s going on at our borders, undermining our local and state law enforcement or eviscerating our military and intelligence services, they attack the gun show loophole as the major problem that needs fixing in order to save us.
(longer segment here)
Rather, the Obama White House sees this as an opportunity to pursue an agenda item, so they're advancing the narrative that terrorists will stop attacking if only we pass gun control laws...
The Obama White House is essentially arguing that passing more gun laws which disarm law-abiding citizens will somehow make jihadists, who have access to international terrorist contacts and back-door weapons smuggling rings, less determined and less capable of carrying out massacres. Right, because it worked great in Paris didn’t it?So within days of the San Bernardino jihadists' rampage, Obama isn't concerned with how to confront ISIS on our own soil (as his plans continue to usher in as many unassimilated, ill-vetted noncitizens as possible). No, he delves right into concocting and masterminding with his executive pen to reinterpret existing law that will ban private sales at gun shows, which has nothing to do with any of this...
Agenda and party collective, first, second and third. Obama would bypass dealing with ISIS and securing the citizenry against external threat to go a-gun-grabbin' within, infringing our unalienable Right to keep and bear Arms.Obama is going after private gun sales at gun shows once again, and this time with an executive order designed to ‘reinterpret existing law’. That’s right, it doesn’t matter if the law doesn’t allow for Obama’s plans to ban private gun sales. He’ll just wave his magic pen and reinterpret the law to do whatever he wants...
...this executive order would have had no effect on this last terrorist attack or many of them for that matter. Even the Newtown shooter who killed all those children used a legally purchased gun.
And the ones that weren’t purchased legally…well, they were obtained illegally anyway. How do you stop that?
Another useless proposal designed to take our gun rights away by a dictator wannabe. That’s all this is.
The law-abiding citizen isn't the problem here, but that's exactly who these oppressive, draconian laws would affect the most (e.g., the gun-free zone those innocent people were murdered in!). But with an increasingly lawless, iron-fisted, centralized government, I suppose the despotic powers that be would find the People more of a threat to their power than the infiltration of our enemies directly targeting the citizenry.
Related links: **LIVE UPDATES*** San Bernardino Shooting Day Three: Allegiance to ISIS
San Bernardino Destroys the Gun-Control Movement
Expanded Background Checks Failed to Stop California Jihad
San Bernardino shooting: 'The biggest problem was that it was a gun-free zone'
