Friday, November 22, 2019

Exposing the 'thoroughly corrupt and tyrannical' cabal of Democrats, bureaucrats and press throughout this impeachment charade

“I don’t care if they’re wearing a military uniform or a suit or a dress. … A cabal is a cabal. And this is a cabal.”
Pegged! It's not only that President Trump wants his own people in these administrative positions carrying out his policies, you know, like ANY PRESIDENT EVER has been afforded! By the way, remember when Obama fired all of Bush's ambassadors! But it's becoming ever more clear that the Democrats are utilizing this cabal of disgruntled bureaucrats, who don't like Trump or his policies, to impeach the President on the most bogus grounds imaginable for the purpose of stopping the executive branch's investigation into their own corruption!



So let’s stop pretending every impeachment witness is a selfless hero, especially when it’s become clearer that some have their own agenda, and not all of them are courageous martyrs for the truth...
Throughout this impeachment charade we’ve been told by the media and House Democrats that a cadre of unelected career bureaucrats in the State Department and the National Security Council who are cooperating with the impeachment inquiry are heroes, patriots, and paragons of virtue and self-sacrifice for defying President Trump and proclaiming the truth about Trump corruption and self-dealing in Ukraine. ...

...we need to pause and ask whose policy priorities should count, the president’s or the career bureaucrats of the “interagency”? State Department diplomats and NSC experts serve at the pleasure of the president, not the other way around. What’s emerging in these hearings is an unmistakable attitude and ethos among career officials that their opinions and priorities about U.S. foreign policy should matter more than those of the president of the United States.

At the very least, House Democrats and the media should spare us the sanctimonious narrative that every impeachment witness is a selfless hero whose credibility is above questioning and whose every statement must be taken at face value. After all, we need look no further than the appalling display of other “deep state” bureaucrats connected to the Russia collusion hoax—former FBI director James Comey, his deputy Andrew McCabe, and the sneering former FBI agent Pete Strzok—for examples of craven, dishonest “deep state” bureaucrats who despise Trump and will seemingly do anything to undermine his administration.

Let’s not be surprised if some of the interagency figures now testifying in the House impeachment probe turn out to be just as dishonest, self-dealing, and contemptuous of the president’s authority to set U.S. foreign policy in Ukraine and determine what’s in the national interest.
Not to rehash the entire week's worth of questioned (and questionable) collaborators in Schiff's circus sideshow (minus the phony whistleblower, of course), but the Republicans, who stepped up to the plate to sit in these sham proceedings with very little resources or rights granted to them, have actually been extremely effective (even if the media doesn't let you know about it, or in some cases straight up contradicts the facts!) in pulling the quintessential information out of these witnesses and crumbling the entire crux of the Democrats' ever-evolving irrationale for wanting to impeach President Trump in the first, second or third place: no quid pro quo, no bribery, no extortion, no nada!



























Neither is hearsay an impeachable offense...and by the way, superb scorekeeping from Turner by week's end, with a fantastic conclusion:
"You guys want to be the laughing stock of history to impeach a President of the United States, because he didn't take a meeting? Oh, please. Dear, God. Please undertake that."


And even ol' Schiffty gets the same out of 'em!
"I want nothing...I want no quid pro quo. Tell Zelensky to do the right thing."


So then why continue this charade? Ranking member Nunes has eloquently expanded on it across every opening statement and every closing statement given daily, but I think it might be Jordan that's put it most succinctly:
"Democrats have never gotten over the fact that this new guy, who's never been in this town, never been in politics, this new guy came in here and is shaking this place up!"

Furthermore, the unfree press is just as much a part of this cabal...
“The legal analysts on TV will not tell you this: The American system and the American people have never ever seen a process like this, ever. It is thoroughly corrupt and tyrannical.”


So even with this big NOTHING burger that the Dems have now concocted, it's likely that they'll still proceed towards THE partisan of partisan votes to impeach a duly elected president and shuttle this phony charge to the Senate for trial in an election year, further dividing the nation like we've never seen before...anything to regain their power, oust ours, and damn sure keep us away from their filthy laundry, of which there is MUCH...


With a corrupt party, an infected press, and assistance from Deep State bureaucrats in this attempted coup, their hope is that We The People break and bend to their will. However, there's really only one thing WE MUST do...and that is to DEFEAT THEM at the ballot box come 2020.
Mrs. Powel of Philadelphia: "Well, Doctor, what have we got—a Republic or a Monarchy?"

Dr. Benjamin Franklin: "A Republic, if you can keep it."
~ response attributed at the close of the Constitutional Convention of 1787, when queried leaving Independence Hall on the final day of deliberation; included within Dr. James McHenry's notes, one of Maryland’s delegates to the Convention

ADDENDUM: With these sham hearings now over, Levin asks a salient question last night: What have we REALLY learned from the Dems’ impeachment hearings?
For one, he continued, “not a single witness felt that the president committed any of those elements of impeachment” listed in the Constitution. “Not one, even those most friendly to the Democrats and hostile to Trump. Not one.”

Additionally, Levin added, “Not one of them had met with the president other than [Ambassador Gordon] Sondland. Only he met with the president. The others never even had a conversation with the president. They’ve never exchanged niceties, emails, texts, nothing.”

“In the case of Sondland, he had three relevant meetings and/or discussions with the president of the United States,” the host continued, “and he says [the] Biden name never came up, tying military aid to meeting with the president of Ukraine or announcing an investigation or conducting an investigation by Ukraine never came up, which underscores what Senator Ron Jonson has said in his meetings and phone calls with the president. He says the same thing: It never came up.”

“The president of the United States did not commit an impeachable offense,” Levin concluded. “Not even close. The president of the United States didn’t do anything wrong.”
Posted by an ebb and flow at 12:00 AM